Different media refer to the legal directory using different names such as online law journals and law blogging. It is a type of online journal that shows entries in a reverse chronological order. Trust these sites for any legal information and various judgments.
The blogging software is powerful enough to store information that can be published. Those publishing articles for the first time can also access the online journal. It allows professionals in the legal fraternity to share knowledge on the internet.
Online law journals are good for Practice groups, law firms and individual attorneys. It increases their reliability and legal authority. This form of centralized approach that lets members of the legal fraternity to quickly and easily share knowledge is great. Lawyers and law firms earns loyalty when they have legal directories. You would succeed as an attorney when you use legal directories as a marketing option.
Legal directories agree on defining legal precedent as sources of the law that involve past decisions by various juries developing law for use by other judges in future when making decisions on related or similar cases. For instance, The United Kingdom judicial system applies precedence based on stare decisis. Including translations the English system developed from Latin
Loosely, it means standing by decisions already made. In law, stare decisis to offer certainty and fairness. There are two segments: obiter dicta and ratio decidendi. Standards of law used by a judge to decide on a particular judgment while concluding the case defines what ratio decidendi entails.
The reasons used in the delivery of this
particular decision must fall in the speech provided at the end of the case. Literaly, ratio decidendi refers to a rule implied or expressed by a judge as an important factor in arriving at his or her conclusion.
On the other hand, obiter dictum constitutes issues said by the presiding judge according to the legal dictionary. Included in the list is the another judge's in the future can follow. Among other things, an example of obiter dicta could be the decision of the judge if the facts turn out as different from the previous case.
It is for this reason that the old facts cannot bind the new judge while reaching his conclusion. In other occasions, cutting an exact difference between obiter dicta and ratio decidendi becomes difficult because they flow in a continuous manner.
Lord Hailsham from Marylebone put forth that, it is a necessity for every court in the lower tie to go here
and agree loyally with decisions made by courts above in the hierarchy made the case while presiding over the Broome v. Cassel case. They include the Court of Appeal because it comes second in command.
Other useful related information may be accessed at https://www.reference.com/government-politics/pro-bono-lawyer-d9212dad44290879?qo=contentSimilarQuestions .